requestId:68499aba1f9026.45298377.
“Remind Confucianism with novels and silences” ColumbiaFemale College Students’ Care Club Big East Asia Department of Education Shang Wei talked about “The Scholars”
Accessor: Shang Wei
Accessor: Zhu Youke
Source: “Southern Weekend”
Time: Confucius 25 href=”https://tw98findmylove.org/”>Sweetheart Garden The 29th day of the 1969th year of the 29th day of the 1960s
/>
As a disgusted person at the subject exam, Wu Jingzi was uneasy in the first half of his life. After the family was exhausted, he relied on selling characters and companions to join in the economy. “The Scholars” also has his own “self-translated” color. (Visual China/Picture)
From 1978 to 1988, Shang Wei worked in the Department of Chinese from undergraduate and academicians to stay in school. Under the guidance of Yuan Xingpei, he studied the poems of the Southern and Northern Dynasties of the Sui and Tang Dynasties, and later served as the assistant of Lin Geng. In 1988, Shang Wei went to Harvard to study for a doctorate degree in Dongya Department and was taught to study classical novels in South Korea.
“At that time, I felt that the contact between classical poems and society was too small, so I turned my interest to novel songs, and also chose social and human classes to evaluate the richness of novel songs from other subjects.” Shang Wei told the Nanbian weekend reporter.
For business, the main thing is to start with carefully reading the text. Based on detailed reading, Shang Wei studied the “Scholars” in the context of thinking about history. “Wu Jingzi’s novelty-based sentiment reminds Confucianism of crisis and its origins of system. In this regard, no one can do better than himEven better. Judging from the writing time, it was earlier than the commentary of Dai Zhen and Ling Tingkan and others about Rong; its direct insight was difficult to match the thoughts and arguments of that time, and they could not be replaced. ”
Shang Wei believes that the overall nature of “The Scholars” has been underestimated for a long time. Lu Xun said that it is “although long, it is the same as short-form”; Hu is a continuation of Baoqiang Club short-story—it seems to be a short-story that can be broken into a short-story and selected for reading. “But this is an incorrect choice. “Shang Wei said, “Honghengshan posted a note on the wall of Taibo Temple. This seemed to be a detailed session without 六国六国, but after eleven times, Wang Yuxi, the person who came here came to visit 六国六国六国, and stood in front of the note, “brushing his sleeves to the dust and reading”. This is a moment of review, allowing us to read the Taibo Tribute through Wang Yuxiu’s ingenuity, and also asked the Taibo Tribute that it could not answer. ”
On May 31, 2018, Kent, studying in Colombia Hall, now a business teacher from the Chinese literature department of Colombia, received an interview with reporters from the Southwest Weekend. The focus of “The Scholars” is Confucian Celebration
South Weekend: Why did you study “The Scholars” from the perspective of gifts?
>Shang Wei:This depends on the characteristics of “The Scholars” itself. In the chapter novels of the Ming and Qing Dynasties, no one directly embraces the focus of the current thinking and discussion like “The Scholars” – as far as the 18th century and middle-aged period of Wu Jingzi’s life – is a Confucian scholarship.
The focus of Confucian scholarship in the early Qing Dynasty is to establish the dominant position of the Confucian scholarship in Confucian society. When summarizing the history teachings in the late Ming Dynasty, scholars in the early Qing Dynasty conducted in-depth reviews on the Confucian scholarship in Song and Ming Dynasty. href=”http://twlovediary.com/”>Baoqing checked and criticized Liu Lie. Many of them believed that Cheng and Zhu (Cheng Jun, Cheng Xi, and Zhu Xi) Neo-King (Ru Xiangshan, Wang Yangming) Mind studies were both invaded by the teachings and especially the ministers, and were departed from the authenticity of Confucianism. Therefore, they tried to return to the classic Confucianism in their minds, and worked hard to restore or rebuild the tribute, providing Confucianism with the foundation and support of the internal system. In conjunction with this, it is from the perspective of Confucianism.The metaphysical concern of learning and the reverse of mind learning to understand one’s own nature have turned to the system construction and tribute practice of learning throughout the world.
This reversal of thinking and learning that describes the Ming and Qing dynasties has led to many questions: the beginning is what the “trade” refers to as the Confucian priesthood dictator. A scholar with Sweetheart Baobaobaobaobaobao.com pointed out that Confucianism includes three aspects: gift system, gifts and gifts. In the early Qing Dynasty, all three cooperated to point to patriarchal ethics, scriptures and gifts that often focus on human ethics. So, is there any basic difference between the tribute school in the early Qing Dynasty and the Cheng-Zhu Academy of Sciences that he criticized? Because the Cheng brothers and Zhu Xi were also keen on establishing a sect-law system based on blood and ground veins. Some scholars simply believe that the result of restoring Confucianism in the Qing Dynasty was to continue the theory and practice of Cheng and Zhu, but they did more realistic literary examinations and richer practical explorations. There are also some scholars who have different opinions, such as Zhang Lie, in his discussion of Ling Tingkan and other mid-Qing scholars, emphasized their view of “represented by gifts”, and believed that the Qing Dynasty’s gifts marked a major paradigm change in Confucianism.
What I am concerned about is that in the tributes that emerged in the Qing Dynasty, can any discussion and practice about Confucianism go beyond the framework of patriarchal law or have nothing to do with patriarchal law? In addition to Dai Zhen, who else has checked and criticized the patriarchal ritual? Did the tribute school in the early Qing Dynasty have any unrealistic breakthroughs in these problems? If there are some words, where is the body now? Where is the meaning?
Nanbian Weekend: How does “The Scholars” respond to these questions? What helps us to know tomorrow the Qing Dynasty gifts 大官网平台平台平台?
Shang Wei: What interested me in “The Scholars” is that it wrote a Taber ceremony in Chapter 37. From a general perspective, it is a sacrifice that is first received by the memory, but by reading it carefully, you can find a phenomenon worth pondering: the Taibo gift was organized by local literati in Nanjing. It is both a official gift that is different from a family that emphasizes the differences in the internal composition of the family. From the perspective of the gift system, it does not rely on the secular power relations and component order represented by government and clans. During the ritual process, the basic elements of the common order of location, composition, and grade are all set up, and the participants think that they have created a relatively equal literati cooperation body. As members of the cooperation, they commemorate the objects of the commemoration, that is, the symbol of the ceremony, Wu Taibo, and cross the historical distance, andHe established his agreement. Who is this Wu Taibo? He was the eldest son of King Tai of Zhou, and said that he had reigned the throne three times, and won the respect of future generations by “making” virtue. In this way, Wu Jingzi obviously placed his Taibo gift outside the official system and patriarchal relationship, thus defining the Confucian gift. This is very important.
The one thing that interested me is that Wu Jingzi participated in the discussions about Confucianism in the thinking and academic circles at that time. “The Scholars [Time Travel/Rebirth] Red Scholars “Hooking up with a Big Boss with Beauty” [Completed + Extra]” describes how literati discussed the gifts at that time and how to plan a sacrifice in detail. This is a different text, and even a descriptive and discerning text cannot be done. Some people may protest, how can they be true to the novel? In fact, as long as the novel is not regarded as a reality, but rather the situation described, the rationale described, and the theme or diagram that is constantly repeated, virtual structure is not a problem, nor is it an obstacle to the need to fight. Not to mention that “The Scholars” has obtained a large number of career prototypes from the author̵